sakurako
Curated Info Hub
guide
tokyo-azabu
slug: guide-tokyo-azabu-muse-sumika-aggo

Summary of experience points based on reviews of "THE MUSE" Sumika (including information on the 30,000 yen 60-minute program)

Based on reviews published on Japanese blogs, we've compiled a list of evaluation criteria and impressions (satisfaction/atmosphere/service quality) for Sumika, a high-end hemp delivery service called "THE MUSE." You can also check publicly available store information, including pricing and contact information.

Content

Here's a summary of the key points from the **Sumika (すみか) 口コミ experience report** posted on a Japanese blog regarding **the high-end delivery service "THE MUSE" in the Azabu area**. The content below is a summary based on a **single review source**, and individual opinions may vary. --- ## ✅ Store information (listed in review) - **Store name**: THE MUSE - **Address (area)**: 麻布 - **Business type**: 高級デリヘル - **Phone**: **050-5527-0319** - **URL**: https://muse2022.jp/top - **Fee (listed in review)**: **60 minutes 30,000 yen** > ⚠️ The price/operating information is based on the time of writing the review (2026-01-01) and is subject to change, so please double-check on the official page before making a reservation.
THE MUSE Related Image 1
--- ## 🔥 Sumika Profile Link (Write in Review) - Profile: https://muse2022.jp/prof?cc=6583
Sumika Related Image 2
--- ## ✅ ‘Communication Book (5-level)’ Evaluation Method Used in Reviews The reviewer used a 5-level scale. - **5**: No text (completely satisfied) - **4**: No improvement needed - **3**: Okay (no major pass/fail decisions) - **2**: Recommended for improvement - **1**: Needs quick improvement Based on this standard, the following items are scored.
Evaluation Table Image 3
--- ## ✅ Sumika Summary by Item (Based on Reviews) Most review scores are in the **3.0~3.5** range, with some mentioning 2.5. Overall, it reads as a tone closer to “no problems, just okay satisfaction.” ### 1) First impression/atmosphere - **Smiling face (笑顔) 3.5**: Expressed as “**a big smile**” - **Expression 3.5**: Smiling impression is emphasized - **Lux 3.0**: Mentioned as “**Nico Nico (grin) smiling face is characteristic**”
Atmosphere image spot 4
### 2) Consideration/communication - **Cheerful 3**: No problems - **Speech style 3**: Feeling of **friendly informal speech** - **Conversation content 3**: Okay - **Recommendation for next visit 3**: Written as “Yes (あり)” - **See-off 3**: Greet with a smile > ✅ Based on the reviews, the overall communication seems to be **okay and friendly** rather than being overly flashy.
Dialogue/Response Image Seat 5
### 3) Service/Play Tendency (Summary of review expression) - **Service spirit 3**: No problem - **Closeness during play 3.5**: “**Good for the Icha Icha type**” - **Kiss 3.5**: **Active** - **Fellatio 3**: “**Has endurance**” - **Moaning 3**: Natural - **SM type 3**: Described as **M tendency** > 🔥 Rather than a strong stimulation/specialized concept, the satisfaction points centered on **skinship and closeness** are mentioned based on the reviews.
Service Image 6
### 4) Hygiene/Appearance Details (Write in Review) - **Bad Breath/Body Odor 3**: Marked as “None (なし)” - **Skin 3.0**: No problem - **Style 3**: “Regular Body Type (レギュラー体系)” - **Underhair 3**: Natural - **Hair 3**: Semi-long, neatly organized - **Aesthetics 3.5**: Rated as relatively high
Appearance/Hygiene Image 7
### 5) Points listed as regrets (within review) - **Underwear 2.5**: Mentioned as “Beige top and bottom set, feels **lacking sexiness**” > ⚠️ This is an area where tastes vary greatly, so rather than making a definitive judgment, it is safer to view it as **the reviewer’s personal impression**.
Point Image Spot 8
--- ## ✅ Overall Review (Summary of Review ‘所感’) The reviewer left a nuance such as **“Overall, I am satisfied, but as a player of this store, I wish there was one more thing (もうワンパンチ)”**. In other words, it is closer to the impression that **there are no major complaints and the result is satisfactory**, but **the decisive blow/strong individuality was weak**. - **Customer Satisfaction 3.0**: Described as “There is no decisive blow, but the result is satisfactory” - Willingness to revisit: Concluded with “I will come again (また来ます)”
Overall Review Image Spot 9
--- ## ✅ This may suit these types of people (estimation based on reviews) Below is a summary of ‘trends’ based on the expressions in the reviews. - ✅ If you prefer **a smiling face/friendly conversation** - ✅ If you value **a sense of intimacy/closeness** - ✅ If you expect **a sense of stability** rather than an excessive setting On the contrary, - ⚠️ If you expect “a point that hits hard at once”, the reviewer also mentioned that there is a possibility that you may feel that **one room was weak**.
Recommended summary image position 10
--- ## Checklist (before reservation/use) - ✅ The fee written in the review is **30,000 yen for 60 minutes**, so **check the official website** to see if the course/option is included - ✅ The phone number is written as **050-5527-0319** (can be changed) - ⚠️ Since the main text is a summary of a **single blog review**, it is recommended that you make a final decision after checking additional information.

Reference links (sources)

The list below contains recently collected links. Please read the original at each link.

Latest pages

Jump to recently created/updated pages.