The content below is information organized based on the scraped text of **a post on a Japanese blog (風俗まにあ) on 2026-01-05**. Since the nature of the article includes an ‘experience/review tone’, the text also explains only **without any factual confirmation, in the form of ‘~ is known/reviewed as’**. --- ## Split Tongue (スプリットタン) = Body Modification introduced as ‘a split tongue’ The source expresses **スプリットタン (スプリットタン)** as **“改造された舌 (remodeled tongue)”** and begins with a joking sentence that it **has a different meaning** from the commonly referred to ‘枚舌 (イマイツォ, two faces). In other words, the ‘two’ here is not a metaphor, but a context referring to **a body modification in the form of a split tongue**.
--- ## The writer's impression: 'Goosebumps' and 'curiosity' together In the source article, the writer writes **“I got a little goosebumps”**. At the same time, in the same article, the writer also expresses **curiosity** by connecting it to sexual acts, as in **“If you fuck me with this tongue…”**. - ✅ **Emotional Response (Review Tone)**: Unfamiliar and Strong Impression (Goosebumps) - 🔥 **Curiosity**: Imagination of “Is it different from usual?” - ⚠️ **Avoid Assertion**: Described as **imagination/guess**, not actual experience! [Split Tongue Related Image 2](/asset/718) --- ## “Is it different from usual?”—The key question the source is talking about The key sentences in the source are summarized as follows. - **“If I receive (oral sex) with this tongue… wouldn’t it be different from usual?”** - But **“I can’t experience this (こればっかりは経験できようもない)”** - Because **“It’s hard to meet a woman with that kind of tongue (なかなか巡り会えません)”** In other words, rather than **confirming the effect**, the article emphasizes the **imagination** that “it seems different” and the **rarity** that “it’s hard to meet”.
--- ## ‘Rarity’ Point: The source of the description “hard to meet” writes that it is **difficult to meet** a person with a split tongue in **real life**. This part is closer to the **writer’s experience/impression** rather than informational, but it accurately points out the point that the reader is curious about. ✅ To summarize, in this article, split tongue is introduced as - **a unique body mod** - and described as **something difficult to experience in real life** - and thus used as a device to **stimulate curiosity** more.
--- ## Blog Character and Cautionary Statement (Advertisement/PR Notation) Source The blog introduces itself as **“A story about the body of a woman who is both vulgar and ulterior motive…promoting AV information”** and states that **PR/affiliate advertisements are included** at the top of the page and in the body. ⚠️ Therefore, it is safe for readers to keep the following in mind. - The text may contain **interest-seeking/promotional phrases** as well as **information** - Expressions like “I feel so good” in the text may be **advertising phrases**, so **generalization/making it a fact is prohibited**! [Split Tongue Related Image 5](/asset/507) --- ## Expressions frequently used in reviews and promotional phrases (‘They say’ tone) The source includes a quote that appears to be a PR phrase, and the gist is **“Everyone says this tongue feels so good that it’s dangerous”**. Sentences like this are more likely to be read as **provocative copy** rather than proving a fact. - ✅ Expressions with **unclear subjects** such as “**Everyone is talking" - 🔥 Sentences that directly describe the sensation **strengthen curiosity** - ⚠️ Since the source itself reveals the PR, it is appropriate for readers to only accept it as **‘according to later information’**! [Split Tongue Related Image 6](/asset/721) --- ## Keywords viewed through related tags: ‘改造舌/スプリットタン’ Tags in the source include **#改造舌 #スプリットタン**, etc. From a search perspective, they can be organized as follows. - **Split Tongue/Split Tan**: Refers to a phenomenon (split tongue) - **Modified Tongue**: Emphasizes the nuance of body modification - **Caution**: Implies that the image/content may be provocative! [Image 7 related to Split Tongue](/asset/503) --- ## Summary of this page: Leave only ‘source-based questions’ instead of making conclusions The message conveyed by this source can be largely condensed into three points. 1) **Split tongue is introduced as a ‘modified tongue’** 2) The author mentions both **strangeness (goosebumps)** and **curiosity (would it be different?)** 3) Actual experience is difficult, so **imagination/reviews/PR phrases** take center stage ✅ In conclusion, rather than **assuming the feel or effect of split tongue as fact**, it is safer to understand it only as **“an imagination that it might be different” or “an impression that it is difficult to encounter”**, as the source says.
--- ## Reference (Source) - Original page: https://hokurikufuzoku.blog.jp/archives/90991266.html - Link to original article mentioned in the text (with source): http://sumomo-ch.com/blog-entry-7913.html#more
