The following information is based on the **“Video Model Recruitment (求人広告) text”** quoted in a Japanese blog post. It cannot be **conclusively** assumed to apply to the actual industry average or all production companies, and it is safer to understand it as “known/reviewed as” based on the tone of the post. --- ## ✅ Key points at a glance (Source: Quote from recruitment text) - **Including masturbation in front of the camera + staff’s hands (caressing)**: It is said to be written as *30,000 yen or more* - **Soft H without anal**: It is said to be *40,000 yen or more* - **Including anal (tachi/uke)**: It is said to be *50,000 yen or more* - It is said that there is a description attached that **there may be a reduction depending on the face disclosure condition** > ⚠️ The notation “or more (以上)” only indicates the lower limit, but the writer of the post interprets it to mean “in practice, the upper limit may be set lower” (estimation/opinion).
--- ## 🔥 It is known that the appearance fee is divided into sections (30,000 to 50,000 yen). In the scrapped article, it is introduced that the recruitment text is divided into steps according to the **intensity (level) of the act**. ### 1) Masturbation in front of the camera + staff's hand (caress): **30,000 yen or more** The article explains that the expression "demon's hand" seems to mean **a situation where the genitals are stimulated by another person's hand** (author's interpretation).
### 2) Soft H without anal: **40,000 yen or more** The article describes it as "possibly including blowjob." In other words, the nuance is that **even if there is no insertion (anal), oral sex or mutual caressing** may be assumed.
### 3) Including Anal Touch/Uke H: **Over 50,000 Yen** The highest range mentions **including anal (touch/uke).** However, the writer adds that “even if it is over that, in reality, 50,000 yen can be effectively operated as an upper limit.”
--- ## ✅ It is said that there is a reduction rule according to the condition of face disclosure (personal exposure). One of the key points of the scrapped content is that **the salary is lowered depending on whether the face is exposed or not**. - There is a condition for **eye covering only in the package (jacket)** (= the face is exposed in the video even though it is covered on the cover), - and it is explained that **if the exposure of the face in the video is reduced or blocked, the appearance fee will be reduced**. Specifically, it is said to be written as follows. ### ✅ If you avoid “exposing your face in the video”: **10,000 yen discount** - The jacket is a cover for your eyes, but your face is visible in the video - If you **choose to reduce the exposure of your face in the video**, it is said to *decrease by 10,000 yen*
### ✅ If you “completely refuse to show your face (covering your face, etc.)”: **20,000 yen discount** - If you **completely refuse to show your face by wearing a mask, etc.**, it is said to *decrease by 20,000 yen*.
--- ## ⚠️ Points emphasized by the author: The scrapped article that says “completely refuse to show your face is 30,000 yen” suggests the following calculation. - H including anal is **over 50,000 yen** - However, if you go **completely NG with no face**, it is **reduced by 20,000 yen** - The claim is that it could end up being **around 30,000 yen** And the author raises the question, “Considering that sexual acts with unknown men are filmed and sold, can this amount be done?” This is not a **factual conclusion, but closer to the author’s impression/opinion**.
--- ## ✅ Possibility of processing allowances such as ‘including transportation expenses’ (author’s estimate) The article contains a sentence to the effect that “**It could be structured to be over 50,000 yen including allowances such as transportation expenses**”. In other words, - the viewpoint is that whether the indicated amount is a **pure appearance fee** or - a **total amount including transportation/other expenses** can vary depending on the site and contract (interpretation of the source article).
--- ## ✅ Note: Mention of few reviews (PR context within source) Later in the scraped article, there is a mention that the work comes up when you search for “homo/gay” on a specific platform, but **there are almost no reviews**. It is safer to view this as **an observation of the writer** rather than data that determines the market as a whole.
--- ## Checklist: Things to check when you see job postings like this Even just the review/citation-based information gives you a hint that you should at least check the following items. - ✅ **Meaning of ‘more than’**: Is it the lower limit, or is there an additional fee if the conditions are met? - ✅ **Face exposure range**: Is only the package covered, or can the video also be hidden? - ⚠️ **Discount conditions**: Does it vary depending on body type/experience/difficulty of filming in addition to facial NG? - ⚠️ **Inclusion of allowance**: Are transportation, lodging, and examination fees included or separate? - ⚠️ **Distribution/sales range**: Distribution channels and period of the filmed material (including whether it can be deleted) --- ## Source (based on scrapbooking) - Original URL: https://hokurikufuzoku.blog.jp/archives/90966666.html - Links to ‘元記事’ in the text are also indicated: http://aramame.net/archives/207310 > ⚠️ The above data is organized based on **quotes of recruitment text and author’s interpretation** included in the blog post. Don't assume it's an industry-wide average; check the actual contract/terms.
