When considering a Shinjuku **Deliher (Delivery Health)**, the most helpful thing is ultimately **specific reviews**. The following is a guide based on one experience report posted on January 1, 2026, summarizing **reservation status, fees, service tone, and gameplay flow** from the perspective of "reviews." ✅ --- ## 1) Basic information (range confirmed in the original review) - **Area**: Shinjuku - **Genre**: Deliher - **Fee**: **100 minutes 22,000 yen** (written in the review as **including 3,000 yen Sapphire discount**) - **Author information**: 50s~, used multiple times (“several times”), described as **second time** with the same woman - **Rating**: **76 points / written as 🌟良嬢(Ryojo)** (described to mean good balance of hospitality, appearance, and service) > ⚠️ The store name/URL/cast name is **limited disclosure** in the original text, so it is not specified on this page either.
--- ## 2) Scoring system: What should I look for to determine ‘whether it’s right for me’? The review site states that 5 items (panel match, style, face, proactiveness/sensitivity, and hospitality) are evaluated out of 5, and **100 points are converted based on the entered items alone**. In this report: - Panel reliability **3 points** (on the “as expected” side) - Style **3 points** (on the “average” side) - Face **3 points** (on the “average” side) - Activeness/sensitivity **5 points** - Service/hospitality **5 points** That is, rather than the appearance being “very well-received,” it is read as **strength in service/proactiveness**. ✅
--- ## 3) Situation before reservation/use: ‘Vacancy’ is a variable on Friday evenings In the review, the writer says that he tried to make a reservation in a hurry on **Friday evening** and looked for a “woman who could play intensely,” but **there weren’t many vacancies**. He then describes choosing a **woman who happened to have an open seat**. - 🔥 Busy times (Friday evenings) may **reduce options** - ✅ If you have a clear ‘desired style (thick/kissy/aggressive, etc.)’, it is advantageous to **explore and reserve in advance**! [Image related to reservation timing](/asset/105) --- ## 4) Meeting~Atmosphere: Described as “soft speech + pleasant consideration” Arrived after waiting for about 15 minutes, started with the greeting “久しぶり (long time no see)”. The author wrote that **the speech was soft and the attitude of checking on one’s mood** was good. In addition, the body type is described as **“short and a little chubby (muchiri)”**, and **the feel of being hugged** is mentioned as an advantage.
--- ## 5) Play flow (based on reviews): ‘Kiss (deep kiss)-centered + active service’ Keywords that are particularly repeated in reviews are **DK (deep kiss)** and **activeness**. The progression is described in roughly the following order. 1) Hug on the sofa → Long **deep kiss** 2) Top removed, description of quick chest/nipples response 3) **Oral service (female blowjob)** begins for the man 4) Description of the woman already being wet (point that varies greatly from person to person) 5) After that, the game progresses with a change in position (missionary → back → rider, etc.) > ⚠️ Detailed descriptions of sexual acts can be interpreted differently depending on personal tastes/experiences, so in this article, I will organize it **only focusing on the ‘atmosphere/characteristics’ emphasized in the reviews**.
--- ## 6) 3 points that felt ‘thick’ (summary of review expressions) In the review, expressions such as **“I enjoyed myself to the fullest for 100 minutes”** and **“I was satisfied 3 times”** appear. Based on this, the reason the writer felt it was thick is presumed to be as follows. - ✅ Described as **the type who kisses a lot** (mentions DK several times) - ✅ **Activeness in leading the mood** (evaluation 5 points) - ✅ **Devotion in service (female/hands, etc.)** strongly mentioned
--- ## 7) Expectations for body type/appearance: “As per panel~as expected” In the tone score sheet, the panel reliability is listed as 3 points (as expected), so it seems safer to see it as “average” rather than expecting a **big discrepancy compared to the photo**. Also, the review contains a sentence to the effect that “the stomach looks a little loose, but it is acceptable considering the age,” so 🔥 If you are someone who **prioritizes a perfect slim body type**, you may need to adjust your expectations.
--- ## 8) Likelihood of this person (based on reviews) The conclusion of the review is closer to “Recommended for people who want a **deep atmosphere** where they hug and give each other deep kisses.” - ✅ I tend to value **kiss/skinship** - ✅ I prefer “the type who actively takes the lead” - ✅ I like to enjoy **long conversations + play** for 100 minutes On the other hand, - ⚠️ If you expect ‘model-level’ looks/style as your top priority, the result may be different (Style 3 points) - ⚠️ During peak times such as Friday evenings, **there may be few vacancies that meet your desired conditions**
--- ## 9) Payment/anonymity-related: Information mentioned in the original text (reference) The original text includes information regarding purchase-type content (‘Kiwami Repo’), including **anonymous purchases possible** and the card billing name being displayed as “codoc”. However, since this is a site policy guide, the actual payment/display method may change, so it is safe to **check the official guide**. ✅
--- ## 10) Summary: Shinjuku Deliher review read as strengths of ‘proactivity/hospitality’ - 🌟 **76 points (良嬢)**: Introduced as “a balanced type that can be recommended with confidence” - 🔥 Listed as strengths: **5 points for proactivity, 5 points for hospitality**, and **a rich atmosphere centered on deep kisses** - ⚠️ Things to note: The panel/appearance is **as expected (3 points)**, and the peak time is a variable depending on the availability. This page is based on only one experience report, and the actual experience may vary depending on the situation/individual differences.
