This is a **Summary Page Based on Experience Reports** for those looking for information on soaplands in the Omiya area. The content below is based on specific blog posts, and as this area varies greatly from person to person, we'll use a "reviews say ~" tone, focusing on ✅/⚠️ points. --- ## 🔥 Basic information on stores/fees (based on review sources) - **Store name**: 大宮PLATINUM (Omiya PLATINUM) - **Address**: 4-26-2 Miyacho, Omiya-ku, Sita-shi, Omiya-ken - **Type of business**: Soapland - **Phone**: 048-729-5486 - **Fees (written content)**: **25,500 yen for 60 minutes** - **Profile link (included in review)**: https://platinum2021.jp/profile?cc=6514
--- ## ✅ Subject of this review: Miri (ミリ) In the review, ‘Miri (ミリ)’ is evaluated on a 5-level scale for each item (5: Stationery) We rated it as follows: None/4: No improvement needed/3: Average/2: Recommended improvement/1: Urgent. Below is a summary of the details written in Korean.
--- ## ✅ Summary of evaluation by item (in review) ### 1) Atmosphere/Communication - **Smiling face (smile)**: **2.5** — The review mentioned that there was not much change in facial expression - **Expression**: **2.5** — There was an expression that it was “close to nothing” - **Speech/Conversation**: **3** — Speech and conversation content were recorded as ‘no problem’ - **Consideration (遣い)**: **3** — Recorded as passable
### 2) Service/Play tendency - **Service spirit**: **3** — Tone that said there were no problems - **Closeness**: **3** — Written as **High degree of closeness** - **SM type**: **3** — Written as “either way” (It is difficult to determine a specific tendency) - **Matt**: **None** — Write ‘none’ in the review! [Service/Play Point Image](/asset/560) ### 3) Detailed Elements (Kiss/Fellatio/Reaction) - **Fellatio**: **3** — Reviewed as “good with moderate pressure + sticky (nettori) type” - **Kiss**: **2.5** — Mentioned as 1 French kiss - **Moaning**: **3** — Writes as natural ⚠️ Since the above items are greatly influenced by personal taste and the condition of the day, it is difficult to guarantee the same experience. ! [Detailed Element Image](/asset/561) --- ## ✅ Notes on Appearance/Condition (in the review) The review contains comments ‘based on the writer’s taste’ rather than conclusively determining the appearance. - **Appearance**: **2.5** — “Not my type” is a personal preference - **Skin condition**: **2.5** — Expression of “It looked rough” - **Style**: **3** — Listed as “Regular Plus” - **Bad breath/Body odor**: **3** — Recorded as no problem - **Hair/Grooming**: **3** — Listed as self-grooming - **Underwear**: **2.5** — Mentioned as beige! [Appearance/Condition Image](/asset/549) --- ## ✅ Response (Finishing/Revisit Encouragement) - **Satisfaction**: **2.5** — Nuance of “I wish we could get a little closer” - **Sending off**: **3** — Seen off at the bottom of the stairs, recorded as **hug and bye** - **Encouragement of return visits**: **3** — Provided with business cards (名刺)
--- ## 🔥 Overall review (summary of the review) The reviewer summarized the overall **content itself was not particularly bad**, but ⚠️ **the atmosphere was less heated because the customer service and reactions were quiet and thin**. That is, - ✅ There were many ‘no problems (3)’ in the basic progress/consideration/hygiene-related items - ⚠️ Expressions, reactions, and sexiness/erotic atmosphere were rated low (2-2.5). However, the conclusion includes **“I’ll come again (また来ます)”**, so rather than concluding with dissatisfaction, it is read in a tone closer to ‘an acceptable experience with some regrets’.
--- ## ✅ ‘Recommended points/points to watch out for’ that can be read in this review ### ✅ For those who expect these points - Prefer **calm progress** over excessive tension - Want to refer to reviews that say **high intimacy** - If you value a ‘pretty good’ rating (3 points) for the pera ### ⚠️ If you value these points, you may be disappointed - Expect a type with rich **expressions/reactions** - If you prioritize active mood-making (sex/eroticism) - If you value kiss frequency/style (mentioned once in the review)
--- ## Check before visiting (realistic tips based on reviews) - ✅ The price was listed as **60 minutes 25,500 yen** based on reviews, but it may vary depending on the time/course, so **it is safe to check the official information**. - ✅ Since it clearly states that there is no mat, it is best to adjust your **play composition expectations** in advance. - ⚠️ Items that reflect the reviewer's taste (appearance/atmosphere) are particularly subject to individual differences.
--- ### Source - blog.livedoor.jp Post: 「ソープランド 大宮 プラチナム ミリ 口コミ体験レポ」(2025-12-28) Summary based on content
