## Kawasaki Hori no Ui Souvenir **「Ragjuari」Iori** Summary based on reviews The following is a reference guide summarized based on the evaluation table and impressions written in the blog post (2025-11-03) **「Souvenir Kawasaki Hori no Ui Souvenir Iori Oral Comics Experience Report」**. ✅ Without exaggeration, I only summarize **the trends seen in the reviews**. ---
### ✅ Store/Rate Information (Write in Review) - **Store Name**: Kawasaki Lagu Juari - **Address**: 8-5 Hori-no-nai-cho, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi - **Business Type**: Soplan - **Phone**: 044-222-0533 - **Rate**: **120 minutes 70,000 yen** - **URL (in the review)**: https://luxury2006.jp/top - **Iori Profile Link (in the review)**: https://luxury2006.jp/prof?cc=5060 ⚠️ Prices/courses/profiles may change depending on the time, so please check the official website before visiting. Reconfirmation is required on the page. ---
## 🔥 Review Rating Structure (5-Step) Reviews are scored using a 5-step bulletin board (evaluation sheet). - **5**: No text (no problem) - **4**: No improvement needed - **3**: Okay (neither acceptable nor unacceptable) - **2**: Would be good if improved - **1**: Needs quick improvement Iori is rated **3-point range** overall, **4 points** for appearance, and **2 points** for ‘inducing next visit’. ---
## Iori Summary by Item (Based on Review Score/Comment) ### 1) First Impression/Response - **Smile**: **3** — Expressed as “A refreshing smile” - **Consideration**: **3** — “No problems” - **Service Mind**: **3** — “No problems” - **Sending Off**: **3** — “Goodbye with a smile” - **Encouraging a Return Visit**: **2** — “There was nothing special” ✅ In summary, the tone of response was **okay**, but there are reviews that say the active comments/inducements to return were **weak**. ---
### 2) Appearance/Condition (Summary as the review expresses) - **ルックス(Appearance)**: **4** — “A cute person with well-defined facial features. Beautiful woman)” - **Style (style)**: **3** — “やや細め (slightly thin)” - **Skin (skin)**: **3** — “No problem” - **Bad breath/body odor (bad breath/body odor)**: **3** — “No problem” - **髪の毛(Hair)**: **3** — “Study no makeup (Site) (Same as the photo image)” - **Expression**: **3** — “Natural” 🔥 Even in the comments, there was a response like “**Looks are good**”, and **comments about the visuals** were repeatedly mentioned (Comment 2025-12-02). ---
### 3) Details (based on review description) - **Underwear**: **3** — “Painless” - **Underwear**: **3** — “Light pink top and bottom… It fits the character, but the sense of luxury is weak” - **How to fold clothes**: **3** — “No problem” - **Aesthetic sense**: **3** — “No problem” ✅ The overall details are summarized as “No problem”, but the sense of luxury is **weak** for underwear. Opinions are included. ---
### 4) Play-related (centered on review scores) - **Closeness of fit**: **3** — “Adequate” - **Mat**: **3** — “こなせてる感じはあります (I feel like I can do it)” - **喘ぎ声 (reaction/groaning)**: **3** — “やや遠慮気味 (a little cautious)” - **SMタイプ**: **3** — “Mタイプでは無い (not M type)” - **フェラ**: **3** — “優しい口当たり (soft feeling)” - **Kiss**: **3** — “Somewhat gentle” - **Sex, eroticism**: **2.5** — “Acting skills in the role of receiving more are needed” ⚠️ Here, too, the flow is **passable (3 points)** overall, and ‘Sex/eroticism’ is written somewhat low at **2.5 points**. ---
## ✅ Conversation/Atmosphere Points - **Speech Style**: **3** — “Friendly” - **Conversation Content**: **3** — “Conversational Skills Are Present” That is, based on the review, it can be read as **conversation goes pretty well**. ---
## Reviewer's Overall Thoughts (Summary) The final thoughts of the review have the following nuances. - **The visuals feel like a player of this team (Luggage)** - Other elements **may need a little more practice** - Concludes with “**I’ll be back**” ✅ In summary, **the satisfaction with the appearance/visuals is relatively high**, and the rest seems to be **average (3 points)**. ---
## Comment Reaction (within the review page) - 2025-11-14: “**It will be an okay response (It will be an okay response)**” - 2025-12-02: “**At least the looks are good (At least the looks are good)**” 🔥 The number of comments is not many, but similar to the main evaluation, the keywords **‘Adequate’ + ‘Strong looks’** overlap. ---
## ✅ This may be helpful for these people (based on review tone) - Tend to prioritize **appearance/visuals** when making a choice - Prefer **a calm atmosphere** over overly flashy service/conversation ## ⚠️ Note/Caution - This page is a summary based on **a single review (1 blog post) and 2 comments**. There may be significant individual differences. - The price (**120 minutes 70,000 yen**) and profile are subject to change, so we recommend checking the **official URL (https://luxury2006.jp/top)** before visiting. --- ### Source - blog.livedoor.jp Post: 「ソープランド 川崎 堀之内 ラグジュアリー Iori 口コミ体験レポ」(2025-11-03) - Reviews Official URL indicated: https://luxury2006.jp/top / Profile: https://luxury2006.jp/prof?cc=5060
