The following is a guide compiled based on **reviews of the "Miria" experience published on specific blogs**. As this is an area where there are significant individual differences, ✅**we will avoid making definitive statements** and introduce it only in a "reviewed/known" tone. --- ## 🔥 Key summary at a glance (based on reviews) - **Store/Area**: Soup Land / **Kawasaki·Horinouchi** - **Store name**: **Kawasaki PREMIUM** - **Price (written in review)**: **80 minutes 50,000 yen** - **Atmosphere keywords (review expression)**: **Bright smile**, **Good service**, **Lux·Slim series**, but mentioned as **slightly guarded**! [Image related to Kawasaki PREMIUM](/asset/551) --- ## ✅ Store information (content written in review/source) The information written in the review is as follows. - **Store name**: Kawasaki PREMIUM - **Address**: 7-25 Horinomai-cho, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki-shi - **Type of business**: Sop - **Phone number**: 044-589-6370 - **Official URL (link in review)**: https://premium2013.jp - **Profile link (link in review)**: https://premium2013.jp/prof?cc=6139 ⚠️ Operational information (fees/commuting/events, etc.) may change depending on the time, so it is safer to **recheck** on the official website before visiting.
--- ## ✅ Based on the “communication table (5 levels)” used in the review This review uses a **5-level evaluation**. - 5: No text (no problem) - 4: No improvement needed - 3: Okay (no pass/fail) - 2: Would be good if improved - 1: Needs quick improvement Based on these criteria, Miria's item-by-item scores are disclosed.
--- ## 🔎 Summary of Miria item-by-item evaluations (as per review scores) Below is a **direct** transcription of the scores presented in the reviews, organized for easier viewing. ### 1) First impression/Customer service - **Smile**: **3.5** — Mentioned as “bright smile” - **Consideration/Looking after moods**: **3** — “No problem” - **Service spirit**: **3** — “No problem” - **Expression**: **3.5** — “Impressive smile until the end”
### 2) Appearance/Cleanliness/Style (based on review description) - **Looks**: **3.5** — “Youthful cuteness” - **Style**: **3.5** — “Slim type” - **Skin**: **3** — “Clean” - **Body odor**: **3** — Indicated as “None” - **Hair**: **3** — “Similar to the site image” - **Underhair**: **3** — “Natural” - **Underwear**: **3** — “Pink series”
### 3) Play-related (based on reviews) - **Closeness**: **3** — “So-so” - **Kiss**: **2.5** — Rated as “Insufficient level” - **Ferra**: **3** — “Stimulating, but monotonous” - **Moaning**: **3** — “Natural” - **SM Type**: **3** — “M” - **Mat**: **None** ⚠️ Personal tastes can vary greatly in this area, so it is best to refer to the scores alone.
### 4) Dialogue/Attitude/End - **Tone of speech**: **3** — “No problem” - **Conversation content**: **3** — “Rich in topics” - **Aesthetic sense**: **3** — “No problem” - **Clothing folding**: **3** — “No problem” - **Customer satisfaction**: **2.5** — Mentioned as “Guarded” - **Sending off**: **3** — “Hug and say goodbye” - **Encouraging return visits**: **2.5** — Marked as “None (なし)”! [Conversation/End Image](/asset/557) --- ## 🧾 Summarize only the ‘impressions (所感)’ of the review Reviewers usually organize it as follows. - ✅ **Good smile**, ✅ **Good hospitality**, ✅ **Good look/style** - However, ⚠️ mentions that it is a pity that **there is a bit of a guard** - Nevertheless, they conclude with “**I will go again (また来ます)**” In other words, although the review is **overall okay~good**, it can be read as a nuance that **people may or may not like it depending on the level of intimacy/openness**.
--- ## ✅ This may be of ‘reference value’ to these people (based on the tone of the review) - If you value first impressions such as **bright expressions/smiles** - If you prefer **stable customer service** that is close to “no problem (無難)” - If you are looking for a **slim style** On the other hand, - 🔥 If you expect a **style with a lot of kisses** (review score 2.5), you may need to adjust your expectations - ⚠️ If you want **low-guard (more active) interaction**, it can also be read as a disappointment based on the review expression
--- ## 📌 Checklist before visiting (without being tidy, safely) - ✅ **Fee 50,000 yen for 80 minutes** is information at the time of the review, so check the official website for the latest price list - ✅ Courses/options, such as “no mat,” may vary depending on the situation, so we recommend checking in advance - ✅ The score of the review is the writer’s personal Since this is a standard (communication table), **do not view it as an absolute evaluation**. Finally, this page is a **guide organizing reviews from a single source**. If you want to compare more reviews, it may be helpful to also look at other reviews from the same business/area.
