The content below is a guide organized based on the claim and basis for the following in the provided scrap text (Japanese blog post): **“When stimulating with fingers, two fingers (two-finger) is safe”**. ✅ However, since physical reactions vary greatly from person to person, please only refer to it as **“as it is known/reviewed”**. --- ## The reason why two fingers (two-finger) is mentioned as ‘safe’ (based on source) The scrap post says with the nuance that **two fingers are closer to optimal** than the method of inserting multiple fingers. There are three main reasons for this. 1) It is mentioned that **it is easier to reach specific points** than with one finger** - The post expresses it as **“it is easier to hit the G-spot with two fingers than with one.”** 🔥 - However, it is safer to read this as **a claim based on the author’s experience/feeling** rather than a generalization. 2) **The claim that it is ‘safe’ compared to 3 or more bones** - While writing that “1 bone, 2 bones, 3 bones… increasing in order is a common method,” the conclusion that **2 bones is not excessive** is emphasized. - ⚠️ At the same time, it also says that “the number used varies from person to person (it also depends on the ‘Ma○ko’),” which **premise that there is no single correct answer** is underlying. 3) **The claim that 2 bones are better in terms of finger/wrist fatigue** - The article says things like “If you keep using 1 bone, your fingers won’t move as you want,” and “(according to the author’s own standards) I’ve even gotten cramps.” - In other words, the point is that the reviewer feels that **control is more stable with 2 bones in sustained motions**.
--- ## (Review tone) If you try two-finger: 3 basic premises There are premises that are strongly repeated in the scrap article. This is **"It must first be sufficiently wet (濡らすのが前提)"**. Based on this, if we summarize the main points without exaggeration, they can be summarized into the following three points. ✅ **Premise 1: 'Sufficient lubrication' comes first** - The article starts with the premise that "it must be wet." ✅ **Premise 2: Mentions that the 'increasing method' like 1→2→3 is common** - Rather than putting in several from the beginning, this refers to the flow of approaching it **step by step**. ✅ **Premise 3: The number of items put in varies from person to person** - The nuance of "some people do more, some do less" is clearly stated.
--- ## The points mentioned as the 'advantages' of Two Finger (without any facts) The claims in the scrap article can be summarized as **summary based on reviews** as follows. - ✅ **It may be easier to reach the stimulation point than with 1 bone** (Author's claim) - ✅ **It may feel like a safer option than with 3 or more bones** (Author's claim) - ✅ **It may cause less finger fatigue during long-term movements** (Author's experience) ⚠️ However, all of these items are **descriptions closer to personal experience, not medical/universal conclusions**.
--- ## What can be read in the mention of ‘My fingers don’t move/I get cramps’ In the article, there are expressions such as “If you keep doing it with 1 bone, your fingers don’t move as you want” and “I’ve gotten cramps before.” The practical(?) message that can be taken away from here is simple. - ✅ **Excessive repetitive movements cause fatigue** - ✅ **Movements can become rough when your condition drops** - ⚠️ Therefore, it is safer to interpret it as “Don’t overdo it, and take a rest when the strain on your hands/forearms builds up.”
--- ## (Source Content) Summary of ‘finger muscles’ talk and hammer curl mentions The scrap article is somewhat joking and mentions things like “If you want to do finger movements for a long time, **hammer curls** are better than dumbbell arm curls.” The reason is that it gives the feeling of **using the forearm more than the upper arm (biceps)**. - ✅ The gist is that “the forearm is more important” - ⚠️ However, rather than concluding this as an exercise prescription, it is more appropriate to view it as **a tip based on the writer’s experience**.
--- ## Checklist for using Two Finger ‘satisfactorily’ (guide format) Below is a checklist that reorganizes the core of the scrap article (lubrication premise, step-by-step approach, individual differences, fatigue) from a **safety/consideration perspective**. 1) ✅ **Check if there is sufficient lubrication first** - This is the premise that was emphasized first in the article. 2) ✅ **Do not increase excessively from the beginning** - Since it was mentioned that increasing in the order of “1 bone → 2 bones → 3 bones” is common, it is safer to **avoid sudden changes**. 3) ✅ **Remember that 2 bones is mentioned as a ‘safe option’ rather than the ‘correct answer’** - Even though there is the expression “optimal,” it acknowledges individual differences at the same time. 4) ⚠️ **Stop or rest when you feel finger/wrist fatigue** - Since the article mentioned the experience of “getting a cramp”, it is safer to avoid excessive continuous use.
--- ## Summary: If you extract only the main points that the scrap article is talking about - ✅ **“It has to be wet (lubrication is a prerequisite)”** - ✅ **“You may feel that two fingers (two fingers) are easier to reach the point than one”**(review tone) - ✅ **“It is claimed to be safer than three or more fingers”** - ⚠️ **“The number of fingers that go in varies from person to person”** - ✅ **“Continuing with one finger may be burdensome for the fingers (fatigue/cramp)”** Lastly, this page is only a **summary of the claims of a single scrap article**. Actual application always varies greatly from person to person, and above all, **stopping when you feel discomfort/pain** is the priority.
