Many reviews say that blog posts that deal with adult/stimulating topics need to consider not only **search exposure (SEO) but also platform policies and expression risks**. The following is a **content safety guide** that summarizes what to check when creating a new page, based only on phrases confirmed in the provided scraped text (Japanese blog post). --- ## 1) Key points confirmed from the source (based on ‘expression’, without factual confirmation) The following elements **appear as phrases** in the post. - ✅ **PR/Affiliate Notice**: It appears to contain advertisements/affiliate notations such as “【PR】…アフィリエイト広告…” - ✅ **External original text link**: There are expressions such as “※元記事はこちら” that guide users to the original text (other sites). - ⚠️ **Age-sensitive expressions**: Expressions such as “10s” appear. In the context of adult content, **age-specific expressions are known to be particularly dangerous**. - ⚠️ **Words describing explicit acts**: Direct expressions such as “フェラ動画” and “セックス動画” are included in the text. - ⚠️ **References to “resembling” a real person**: Phrases such as “松本いちか似” and “本人じゃない” exist, so there is both a reference to similarity and a denial (that is not the person). ---
## 2) PR/Affiliate notation: How clear should it be? The source contains **PR notation** and a “contains an affiliate advertisement” notice. Many people agree that it is safe to check the following when creating this type of page. - ✅ **Notice at least one place on the top/bottom of the page**: So that users can easily recognize advertisements and affiliate links. - ✅ **Explain the meaning of ‘PR’**: Rather than simply writing PR, it is common to write it in a more detailed way, such as “May contain affiliate links.” - ⚠️ **Do not interrupt the flow of the text**: There is a review that says that excessive repetition has a negative effect on reliability. ---
## 3) Checklist when inducing external original text links (“元記事”) There is a flow in the scraping text that guides to an external site with “※元記事はこちら”. If you add a source link on a new page, it is recommended to consider the following. - ✅ **Clearly indicate the source as ‘source’**: Distinguish between “source/reference” rather than a simple link. - ✅ **Limit the purpose of the link**: It is known to be safe to use a ‘verification/reference’ tone. - ⚠️ **Do not overheat the call-to-action**: Hyperbolic expressions such as “more stimulating videos” can increase the risk. ---
## 4) When age (teens, etc.) expressions are included: First thing to do The source uses the expression “teens.” Many have pointed out that when age is specified in the context of adult content, it can be interpreted as a **very sensitive signal** in terms of platform/policy. - ⚠️ **Avoid age-specific expressions**: It is known to be safe to avoid using expressions that suggest minors, such as “teens.” - ⚠️ **If removing the nuance of “minors” is impossible, redesign the topic itself**: If it is unavoidable due to the context, it is common to change the page direction to “safety guide/policy information.” - ✅ **Minimize explicit depictions of actions**: There are reviews that say that the risk level can increase when combined with age expressions. ---
## 5) Expressions that “resemble (似)” a real person: Sentence design sources that reduce misunderstandings include disclaimers such as “松本じゃないですよ!” along with “松本ちか似”. Some argue that these types of phrases, even if intended to **prevent misunderstandings**, can strengthen the connection to the person during the search/spreading process. - ✅ **Minimize expressions of comparison/similarity**: ‘~resemble’ can generate clicks, but can also increase risk. - ✅ **Disclaimers alone may not be enough**: Even if you say “not me”, repeating the name in the title/meta can strengthen the connection. - ⚠️ **Be careful about exposing the real name in the title**: Some reviews say that even if you include it for SEO, it can be disadvantageous from a safety/policy perspective. ---
## 6) Use of explicit words (actions/videos): ‘Expression level’ comes before SEO Direct words such as “フェラ動画” and “セックス動画” are visible in the scraped text. The following adjustment methods are often used on new pages. - ✅ **Euphemisms instead of direct words**: For example, categorization such as “adult videos” and “explicit expressions”. - ✅ **Providing information in the context of ‘safety/policy’**: Focus on risk guidance rather than depicting stimulation. - ⚠️ **Same standards apply to images/thumbnails**: Some argue that even if only the text is purified, if the image is provocative, it can lead to the same problem. ---
## 7) Page Structure Example (Guide Type) — How to Provide Information Safely As the source is of an adult content nature, it is known to be safer to structure the new page as a **‘Expression Check Guide’** rather than a **‘Reproduction of Review/Testimonials’. 🔥 Recommended section composition (example) 1. **Purpose of this page**: Check policy/expression risks 2. **PR/affiliate notice example**: Explanation of notation methods such as “【PR】…” 3. **Source link notation principles**: Be careful when providing “元記事” information 4. **Guide to prohibiting/avoiding age expressions**: Why expressions such as “10s” are dangerous 5. **Minimizing mentions of similarities to real people**: Side effects of “similar” expressions 6. **Expression level control checklist** ---
## 8) Final checklist (1-minute check before posting) - ✅ Does the page have a **PR/affiliate link notice**? - ✅ Is the “source/reference” **clearly indicated**? - ⚠️ Are there any **age-specific expressions reminiscent of “teenagers/minors”?** - ⚠️ Are explicit action words **repeated**? - ⚠️ Did you **combine** “resembles” a specific real person/real name with **the title**? ---
## 9) Summary The provided sources contain **PR (affiliate) notices**, **inducing links to original text**, **expressions related to age (teens)**, **explicit language**, and **mentions of similarity to real people (including denials of being the person themselves). Since many reviews indicate that these elements can be sensitive from a search/policy perspective, it is known to be a relatively safe approach to design new pages in the form of **‘expression check/safety guide’** rather than **reproducing stimuli.
