Content
⚠️ **Warning (For Adults)** This page provides general information on how to read reviews and experience reports for adult content contained in the provided sources. We avoid specific, extreme language and treat the content as "based on the poster's impressions" in accordance with the source's warnings. Please follow the laws and regulations of each country or region when viewing. --- ## What you'll learn from this article ✅ - How to extract the basic data (price, area, genre) that appears in user-submitted reviews - An overview of the blog's rating score calculation logic (converting a 5-point scale to 100 points) - Checkpoints to avoid taking user reviews at face value --- ## Example source: User-submitted review from the Shinjuku area (Gingira Tokyo) The source provides the following basic store information for "Gingira Tokyo." - **Area: Shinjuku** - **Genre: Delivery Health** - **Price: 62,000 yen for 180 minutes** - Poster: Megane (3rd time) / Poster's age: 30s - Number of times using the shop: 2nd time 🔥Key point: This kind of numerical information is less likely to be inaccurate than written reviews, so checking it first will help you make a comparison.  --- ## Understanding the blog's "overall score" method (important)✅ The source blog provides the following explanation of how ratings are calculated. - Rate each of the five evaluation criteria out of a maximum of 5 points. - The score is automatically converted to 100 based on the total score, using only the criteria entered. - Unrated criteria are excluded from the calculation. - Example: 12 points (out of 15) for 3 criteria is converted to 80 points. ✅ This means that the number of criteria rated may differ from report to report, which can lead to misunderstandings when comparing scores alone.  --- ## Experience Report Notes: Not a Guarantee ⚠️ The source clearly states the following: - These are the poster's personal impressions. - While the intention is to share information seriously, - They do not guarantee the gameplay. ✅ As a reader, it is safe to draw the line between "interesting/high-energy" and "guaranteeing the same experience."  --- ## Checklist for Reading Posted Reports (Determining Reproducibility) ✅ The following are checklists based on the nature of the information in the source (posted type, primarily personal experiences). 1. **Is the basic data clear?** (area/genre/course duration/price) 2. **Is the poster's attributes written?** (e.g., age, number of visits, etc.) 3. **Is the score parameter (number of evaluation items) consistent?** 4. Is the tone of the experience "it was..." rather than "determinative"?** 5. If there are many hashtags (e.g., Shinjuku, delivery health, etc.), distinguish between the core of the main text and the classification. The source contains tags such as "Shinjuku," "Delivery Health," and "Glittering Tokyo," as well as numerous other attribute tags. While tags are useful, it's recommended not to give them the same weight as the main text.  --- ## Reference: Smells of "blog management notes" seen in other sources The provided sources also contained warnings and management notes commonly seen on adult blogs. - Age verification text on FC2 Blog (e.g., "Viewing is prohibited for those under 18 years of age") - Notes within Livedoor Blog articles (e.g., "Please note that this blog contains affiliate advertising") ✅ When such notices are present, readers can reduce discrepancies by keeping the following in mind. - **Whether or not there is advertising or promotional content** (There are cases where the passion of the content is mixed with sales promotion) - If there is a link to the original article or source, **the relationship between the source and the main text** (is it an introduction or a unique experience?) (For example, in other sources, you may see phrases like "※The original article is here.")  --- ## Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) ### Q1. Is "180 minutes for 62,000" cheap or expensive? A. This page does not contain data on other stores' market prices in the source, so it is not possible to definitively say whether it is cheap or expensive. However, it is easier to judge by comparing the same criteria, such as "duration (180 minutes)," "total amount (62,000)," and "whether or not there is a discount." ### Q2. Is a high overall score a good deal? A. Because the score is calculated based on the entered evaluation items only, you need to be aware of fluctuations when there are only a few evaluation items. It's safer to read not only the score but also basic data and the poster's usage frequency. ### Q3. Can I expect the experience to be as good as it is? A. As stated in the source text, posts are personal opinions and not guarantees. While you should have expectations, it's safe to conservatively estimate reproducibility. --- ## Summary ✅: Read user-submitted reports in the following order: "Numbers → Rules → Notes." First, check the numerical information, such as the area (Shinjuku), genre (Delivery Health), and price (180 minutes for 62,000 yen). Next, understand the blog's unique score calculation rules (excluding unrated posts and converting to 100 points). Finally, as stated, treat experiences as reference information, assuming they are not guarantees. Keeping these three points in mind will make it easier to objectively compare even the most passionate experiences. --- ### Reference Sources - https://makairepo.com/archives/20260103.html - https://chienokinomi.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-24683.html - https://hokurikufuzoku.blog.jp/archives/90965136.html - https://hokurikufuzoku.blog.jp/archives/90988550.html - https://hokurikufuzoku.blog.jp/archives/90988528.html
