This page is a content that summarizes the key information centered around the experience report of ‘Claris Tokyo～Claris Tokyo～’ introduced as a taxi in the Shinagawa area of Tokyo.
The report includes the business name, official website, course time/fee, cast profile (height/size), and an evaluation based on a subjective rating scale (S to G). There is.
The course listed is 28,600 yen for 70 minutes, and the author mentions that it feels like it is somewhat discounted due to the campaign.
The cast is listed as ‘Bonda Neru’, and on the profile, he is 23 years old, 170cm tall, and is listed as a size 95(H)·56·84. The report also includes a separate item titled ‘Estimated age 30’.
The author says that the ‘tall stature, slenderness, and nice body’ alone are enough to create a sense of rarity, and that he felt anticipation just from looking at the photos.
The item for celebrity look-alikes is written with the intention that ‘nothing comes to mind in particular’, and the style is marked as slim.
The report includes the expression ‘established service in high-end stores’, and the overall impression of stability without any major gaps is summarized as the core impression.
While the author concludes by giving it a ‘passing grade’, he explains the balance between expectations and the actual experience with the nuance that it is not ‘a big hit with both hands’.
Also, I wrote that I confirmed the mention of ‘coming from a high-end restaurant’ in the profile introduction, and added my personal interpretation of the additional fee.
The evaluation items are presented as look (face) B, style (body) A, service (hospitality) A, technique (play) A, and overall A.
The grade is a subjective evaluation system from S to G, and the report also includes a description of the criteria called ‘cost-effectiveness evaluation’.
In terms of willingness to reuse, ‘I want to nominate the same cast’ was selected, so the overall satisfaction is organized on the positive side.
The report writer made a reservation based on his previous experience (satisfaction/disappointment) and received a ‘passing score’. In a similar situation, it is helpful to first clearly organize your preferences.
Along with the profile (height, body type, chest size, additional fees, etc.), it is useful to compare and prioritize whether the factor you consider important is ‘style’ or ‘service stability.’
In addition to looking at the ratings on the evaluation sheet, it will be helpful to check the impressions (stable service, experience compared to expectations) mentioned in the main text as well to make a choice.
