This experience was a report from using Deriheru in the Chiba area, and the 100-minute course was selected. A new discount was also applied during the experience.
The author gave the total score of 72 points, giving it an average rating (satisfied, but repeating it is difficult). Overall, there was a certain level of satisfaction, but it was summarized that it lacked the ‘erotic depth’ that was expected.
In terms of details, panel reliability and style were evaluated as high, and the face item received the highest score. On the other hand, the items of initiative/sensitivity and service/hospitality were rated relatively low.
The writer made a reservation with the expectation that she would be a ‘stylish beauty’ after seeing her scheduled work and the review. On the day, the schedule was confirmed in a relatively relaxed reservation situation, and expectations were said to have grown even more.
Arrival was very quick, and the outfit was described as a white slim shirt and miniskirt that highlighted the line of her legs. The overall appearance and body type were similar to the image I had previewed, so the initial impression was good.
However, it was mentioned that the level of concentration felt low during the icebreaking conversation, and there was a feeling of anxiety due to the lack of initial physical contact.
Although the foam (lotion) washing mentioned as a feature of the store was performed, it was said that there was a waiting time during the preparation process, so it felt like my hands were somewhat empty.
The foam cleansing itself was closer to the feeling of ‘just washing’, and the expected stimulating effects or erotic elements were not that great. He also wrote that he wondered ‘what is the meaning of bubble lotion’ while washing the bubbles off right away.
After that, they went into the bathtub together and became physically intimate, but since there wasn’t much conversation, the mood itself didn’t get that heated up. It can be summarized.
After moving to the bed, there was a kiss (including a deep kiss). Although they responded, they said they felt that there was a lack of ‘immersion.’ After the breast and nipple attacks, the clit attack was followed by a more distinct response, and it was shown that it was easier to reach orgasm when nipple stimulation was also performed.
As clit and cunnilingus requests continued, descriptions of multiple orgasms appeared. It was summarized that the response became stronger with finger insertion, and the response was particularly greater when nipple stimulation was performed simultaneously.
After the change of attack and defense, nipple stimulation and hand stimulation became the focus, and the fella was described as a ‘soft and salivary type.’ There are also scenes where they take a break in the middle by taking a ‘time’ because the request for pace adjustment was not well reflected.
The suggestion regarding insertion was given as an option, and it is said that it was not carried out considering the total cost burden and expectations for the atmosphere. The ending was nipple stimulation + hand stimulation, and although the ejaculation itself was good, the overall conclusion was that ‘something was lacking.’
The author said that it was interesting that the partner reached orgasm multiple times, but looking back, he evaluated that ‘it was lacking in eroticism.’ It is described as having a weak ‘lewd and dense atmosphere’ because it feels like it progresses lightly like exercising.
Even in the opponent’s attack part, the so-called expected elements (such as soft closeness or longer oral play) felt lacking, and it was disappointing that there was a lot of hand-centered flow.
In conclusion, through the experience of ‘actively targeting a stylish beauty and making her climb several times, I was not completely satisfied’, it ends with the message that the atmosphere, immersion, and density determine satisfaction as much as the number of stimulations.
