Recently, a Japanese blog (a personal blog covering experiences and information related to adult entertainment/AV) raised the question, **“Don’t you think there have been more orgies and harem works in AV these days?”**. The gist of the article is closer to “I thought that with the new AV law, **multiple appearances** works would decrease, but it actually feels **more noticeable**.” However, it’s safe to first understand that this is not a statistic but a story based on **the author’s observation/experience**.
--- ## ✅ Reasons for feeling it has ‘increased’: Actual increase vs. Increase in exposure The original article honestly states that he couldn’t distinguish “whether it has actually increased or whether it’s just me feeling that way” (the point being “I could look into it, but I don’t have time”). This is the key point. **Perceived increase** can usually be explained in two ways: - **Possibility of increased actual quantity**: If production companies release more ‘big-show’ type works with multiple actors - **Possibility of greater visibility in marketing/display**: As the expression “I understand that it stands out because it’s a work that each maker put their heart and soul into,” if large-scale works are displayed at the front as **representative works/signature products**, it may seem like there are more of them! [Related image](/asset/1870) --- ## 🔥 Perceived changes when production companies push ‘big-shows’ The article also suggests that production companies seem to **release big-show works indiscriminately**. Here, ‘indiscriminately’ is not an objective number, but rather, from the consumer’s perspective, it is closer to the impression that “similar concepts are frequently seen.” Another interesting point is that the writer mentioned **efficiency from the consumer’s perspective (cost-effectiveness)**. - The expression “We like costuming” → interpreted to mean that you can enjoy multiple appearances/multiple scenes in one work - So it leads to the question “Are there more because they sell well?” In other words, based on reviews, we can cautiously say that this genre can be exposed more often when **demand (purchase/preference) and supply (planning large-scale performances)** overlap.
--- ## ✅ Orgy vs. Harem: Although they may seem similar, the viewing points are different The original text talks about “orgy/harem” together, but the viewing points are slightly different. ### 1) Orgy series - The structure itself where multiple characters are entangled at the same time is the key - Scene transitions are fast, and 'who is with whom' can become complicated ### 2) Harem series - The structure where many people gather around one (or a few) person is the center - Characters/role division (e.g. active character, competition for leadership, etc.) tend to be emphasized! [Related image](/asset/1871) --- ## ⚠️ 'Preference' revealed in the original text: Many male actors vs. many actresses The author leaves a sentence to the effect that "I **like an orgy with many actresses better than an orgy with many male actors**." This is purely a matter of personal preference, but from the reader's perspective, when choosing a work, you can turn it into a checklist as follows. - ✅ Is the cast composition my preferred direction? (Actress-centered/Male-centered) - ✅ Does the more characters there are, the more **the proportion of actors I want** is secured? - ⚠️ As the number of people increases, the scenes may become scattered, making it difficult to **watch with a specific actor in mind**! [Related image](/asset/1872) --- ## ✅ Examples mentioned in the text (feel like ‘representative works’ in the review) Examples of specific works appear together in the original text. Since the title/concept is strong, it is possible that this type of work has reinforced the feeling that “it’s more noticeable these days.” - “ダスッ! Presents WELCOME TO THE ようこそ！ズコバコキングダム” - Phrases that bring **multiple actresses** to the forefront, such as “最強AV女優10人衆…” - **Ichika Matsumoto** is mentioned as an actress in the text. The important thing here is that this information is at the level of **introduction text included in the blog post**. It's difficult to determine the market share/trend representation of a work, so it's safer to interpret it as something like "this concept is strongly reflected in the promotion."
--- ## ✅ When you feel like it's "increased," here are some realistic ways for readers to check. The original author said, "I could research it, but I don't have time." So, here, **without making any overly definitive conclusions**, I'll only summarize some simple confirmation methods that readers can use. 1. ✅ Check if works with **multiple appearance keywords** appear frequently in the recently released/sales list 2. ✅ Observe if titles that the maker has put a lot of effort into, such as “works of one’s heart,” appear on the **main display** 3. ✅ Check if my viewing/purchasing habits are skewed towards a specific genre, resulting in **strengthened recommendation exposure**! [Related image](/asset/1874) --- ## Conclusion: It is more accurate to look at it as a ‘feeling based on reviews’ rather than statistics. In summary, the source is a **personal blog observation** that “I thought multiple appearances would decrease after the new AV law, but recently, **orgies/harems seem to have increased**.” Therefore, when dealing with this topic, it is more appropriate to say “it feels like it has increased/it is noticeable”** rather than confirming “it has increased.” - ✅ If production companies put more works with the nature of large-scale performances at the forefront, the perceived increase may occur. - ✅ From the consumer's point of view, it may be perceived as a 'cost-effective' product and the preference may continue. - ⚠️ However, whether there is an actual increase requires separate data confirmation (the original text also acknowledges this)
--- ### Reference (source nature) This page was reconstructed based on the text (including impressions/opinions/promotional text) included in the post on **hokurikufuzoku.blog.jp** on 2026-01-06. Since it is a blog format with advertising/PR information, it is safer to read individual expressions as **reviews/impressions**.
