If you're looking for information on Tokyo customs and practices and want to **search based on reviews**, the [Tokyo] TOP list of "Fucolles" created with everyone's reviews can be a helpful guide. This page prioritizes finding stores through **coupons, rankings, and reviews**, and provides a search menu segmented by **area (AREA) and industry (業種)**.
--- ## ✅ What this guide covers - What does **Core Menu (掲載店/ランキング/クチコミ/絞り込み)** mean on the [東京都] TOP screen? - How to narrow down your search using the **by region (吉原/池袋/新宿, etc.)** list? - How to filter again by **by industry (デリヘル/出張エステ/ホテヘル/ソープランド/ヘルス/メンズエステ非風俗)**? - How to read the **evaluation items (ルックス/スタイル/サービス)** on the review screen? --- ## 🔥 [東京都] Based on the screen text scraped from the navigation route visible directly from the TOP, the phrase “**クーポン・ランキング・クチコミで探せる風俗情報**” can be seen at the top, and it is actually divided into sections as shown below. 1) **Tokyo store shopping mall** - For example, **Article 1: 新宿発出張エステ NORTH(ノース) 新大久保店**, **Article 2: Ｍ性感・ＳＭ無我**, **第3位: 品川発デリヘル 5反田フェチクラブ** is exposed. - Each item is accompanied by status information such as **number of reviews**, “working every day”, “waiting for a while”, “coupon --”, etc., so it seems to be designed to show the number of reviews and operating status together.
2) **Tokyo Cast Ranking** - Cast examples include **Miran (19 years old/158cm/Hcup)**, **Mirei (22 years old/161cm/Ecup)**, **Minori (23 years old/165cm/Ecup)**, and they are tagged as “刺青なし/現役学生/未経験者/外国人可”. - This tag helps with **condition matching**, but actual experiences vary greatly from person to person, so it is safer to **cross-check with reviews**.
3) **Tokyo no Kuchikomi** - Examples of reviews include “Sarasa 満足点 95 points”, “Tare Panda 89 points”, “Blue Be 94 points”. - **Lux/Style/Service** star ratings (★) are also displayed in table format.
--- ## ✅ How to narrow down by area (AREA) first: Decide on “Where in Tokyo?” [Tokyo] At the top, there is “**Search from AREAS**”, and representative areas are listed below. In addition, the phrase “▼Realistic review search method▼ Narrow down by AREAS” is displayed along with the number of registrations** in ( ) for each area. Examples (as shown): - **池袋の風俗（82）** - **新宿・大久保・高馬場・中野の風俗（75）** - **上野・鶯谷・日暮里・浅草・葛飾の風俗（60）** - **五反田・目黒・白金の風俗（53）** - **渋谷・恵比寿・原宿・青山の風俗（47）** - **吉原の風俗（14）** etc. It is safe to read these numbers as a hint of **information quantity (registration/exposure scale)** rather than ‘good/bad’. Areas with many reviews may have more choices but be difficult to compare, while areas with few reviews may have fewer choices but be faster to navigate.
--- ## ✅ Narrow down by industry (業種): Even in the same area, the characteristics are different [Tokyo] The top has a long structure of “**Search by industry**”. Even in the same area, there are separate links for each industry, so you can navigate in either direction: **‘Area → Industry’** or **‘Industry → Area’**. Examples of confirmed industries: - **Delivery** (e.g. Ikebukuro's delivery service, Shinjuku...'s delivery service, etc.) - **Outdoor Este** (e.g. Ikebukuro's delivery service, etc.) - **Hotel Este** - **Soapland** (e.g. Yoshihara's soapland, etc.) - **Help** - **Masturbation/SM** - **Onagura** - **Men's Este (non-traditional)** ⚠️ The industry names are the categories displayed in the site menu, and the actual service scope or regulations may vary depending on the region/business, so it is recommended to **check reviews (kuchikomi) and business information together**.
--- ## ✅ How to read review (kuchikomi) scores/star ratings: Understand the ‘evaluation axes’ first In the scraping table, **looks / style / services** are repeatedly displayed as review evaluation items. That is, when looking at reviews, you can divide them into the following axes. - **looks**: Appears to be a personal evaluation of appearance/impression - **style**: Appears to be a personal evaluation of body type/style - **service**: Appears to be a personal evaluation of response/process/overall satisfaction ✅ Tip: Even if the star rating is high, the perceived experience can vary depending on personal preference, so it is safer to look at it together with the **number of reviews** if possible and compare it by changing the region/industry.
--- ## 🔥 How to use ‘ranking’? (For reference only, not overconfidence) [Tokyo] TOP has “Tokyo Store Ranking” and “Tokyo Case Ranking” separately. Ranking is useful as a **guide when entering for the first time**, but it is safer to keep it as ‘reference material’ by looking at the elements below together. - **Number of reviews**: Measures the level of accumulated reviews - “本日出勤 / 待機中”: Information that appears to be operating/standby status - Coupon display sometimes looks like “クーポン --”, so **coupons may not always be available**
--- ## ✅ Actual search scenario (example): Quickly narrow down in 3 steps Below is a typical flow that is possible with only the [Tokyo] TOP configuration. 1) **Select region** - For example, start from a place with many registrations such as “Ikebukuro no Fusoku (82)”, or select a region that matches your movement route. 2) **Select industry** - Even within the same region, branch out such as “Ikebukuro no Deliheli / Ikebukuro no Outlet Este / Ikebukuro no Soplando …” 3) **Check the evaluation axis in the review tab** - **Lux/Style/Service** Compare the star rating, scores such as “満足点”, and the number of reviews together! [Search flow image](/asset/1055) --- ## ⚠️ Checkpoint: ‘絞り込み（NEW）’ and condition tags show “**絞り込み（NEW）**” in the auxiliary tool menu, and in the cast information. Tags such as “non-sumo/no fragrance/no piercing/foreigners allowed/obstacles allowed” are exposed. - ✅ Advantage: Helps you quickly find the conditions you want - ⚠️ Caution: Since tags are **information based on notation**, it is appropriate to **check with reviews** on the premise that the actual experience/situation may be different.
--- ## Summary: [Tokyo] TOP appears to be structured for ‘review-centered search’ ‘フーコレ’s [Tokyo] TOP connects **area (エリア)·industry (業種)·ranking (ランキング)·review (クチコミ)** on one screen, and appears to be a form that quickly organizes “where/which industry/how to compare with reviews”. ✅ The key is to repeat the process of **ranking → review confirmation → region/industry readjustment**. Given the nature of review-based sites, **comparing across multiple regions/industries** is known to be a more common method for reviewers than making a single decision. --- Source: https://www.fucolle.com/08/top.php (Based on scraped [Tokyo] TOP screen text/composition)
